17 User(s) are 이 주제를 읽고 있습니다. (지난 30 분 동안)
0 members, 17게스트
0 members, 17게스트
Dân số hiện tại:
Word Association (53 Người chơi)
AoKTS updates (44 Người chơi)
1.6 reward campaing (37 Người chơi)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (37 Người chơi)
TIW 2020 Map votes (18 Người chơi)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (13 Người chơi)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (12 Người chơi)
Chủ đề tích cực nhất tuần qua:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (46 Bài viết)
1.0c shows in game instead of 1.... (10 Bài viết)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (8 Bài viết)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (8 Bài viết)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (6 Bài viết)
AYUDA!! LOST CONNECTION TO THE S... (5 Bài viết)
Error al lanzar la partida (5 Bài viết)
What exactly is your problem with a vote?
If you wan't a tournament where you dictate every rule, then i suggest you go host one. A vote is the only fair way to do it here.
dont answer anymore pls bcoz i wont
making live vetos forces everyone to be ready for every situation with really not thinking time, which forces you to be ready before the match set up starts (as i said before)
They also have a limited roster unlike our case, they cannot entirely switch out their players for every other match.
Honestly, the only real reason for you insisting on this can be, that you try to get an advantage by picking weird and unusual civcombinations and not allowing the opponent time to create a gameplan. And you talk about making it competitive... Trying to get cheap wins?
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
That is how RB plans to knock out xCs into the Silver League.