I think he meant that all the processes should be ended by that time, not about how and which order they are done.

Well that allows clans to post all maps at the last minute, not allowing time for enemy clans to choose vetos to begin with. There must be a defined time gap between map pick reveal and veto deadline or it physically can't work.

Again example, clan a posts their map picks at 11:59pm the day before games. The deadline is midnight. After midnight clan b can't use their vetos for anything except random. I.e. clan b are not able to use their vetos for anything but random. This just isn't thought out.

These are not enforced and it does not mean there is a punishment for failing to do so, just about a guideline to smooth up things.

Edit: Just my take on how loose Frankie usually runs things.

Edit2: I think his whole point is that in case a tournament host/moderator is needed to overwatch the games then a lot of legwork is done beforehand and people can play the matches smoothly, hopefully without hiccups and flame wars.

LUSTFUL GAMES WILL BE LEGENDARY

NEW META IS HERE

XD. GREETS

both teams give maps 24 hours before to army and he posts them same time. 1 hour before the set is scheduled to start teams go into a room together and do their veto's. Anything left over once the games officially start can only be used in the random decider. Sounds like the best option to me, but frankie you need to put the tournament host rules down and make it official. If anyone disagrees with what I said above and you should speak up and give reasoning.

this is fine for me

Not fine for rb

Vetos should be done live not 1hr before or anything

For what reason? Dave already mentioned this before being the previous TIW streamer how doing the veto's live makes things much more unpleasant & extends the time for no reason honestly. We could have everything well organized and know exactly what is out of the map pool before games even start and not have to worry about veto's last second & then teams having to take time to think about what they want to replace with or if they want/need to switch maps around entirely.

As I said frankie be the tournament host and put something down that we all follow together. Less confusion.

Xcs bek is crying to me about this 24h rule. Hé says it's very unfair and a conspiracy against xcs. Im not sure why hé thinks this though (hé wouldnt say) but apparently it's a big issue.
Since hé is too shy to say anything himself hé asked me to do IT. Can we please discuss this more so hé can stop crying to me about IT in pm?

Here u go Bekkie, you're welcome

@xcs if u dislike this 24h rule, can u give the reasons why you dont like IT and suggest alternatives?

Personally i dont care all too much, IT Just seems like a practical thing to do

Why do xcs always think there's some big conspiracy against them?

How does this benefit anyone else in any way?

Honestly we don't care if they're live or not, but the whole point is making it more bearable for viewers and streamers and generally make the experience better, last tiw there was so much ****ery between games with ****ing around with vetos and what not that it made the sets take far too long, and this was one of the primary criticisms from viewers and streamers.

Rather than just saying wahhh no and stamping your feet like children, how about at least giving some reasons so we can try to come to some kind of agreement? Nah just crying and claiming it's some conspiracy against you is better

If you disagree, try to be adults about it for fk sake...

?

??

Do the vetos live and give 5min limit to pick a new map ez