CBA Persia Handicap

 [Dvs_]Emissary_


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 25 July 2008
글 개수:1005
Posted 8 February 2015 - 23:24 pm
Seriously Persia is totally OP in CBA and CBA hero. If a player is half decent and knows how to use them, which everyone does now, they are unstoppable.

Yeah I just lost a game with persia but that's not why I made this thread. I'm seeing a pattern that a large proportion of games are lost on persia's overwhelming power. So I hereby decree that pers needs a huge ****ing handicap. Thank you.
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [_MD_]DaGhostInside


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 21 September 2008
글 개수:700
Posted 8 February 2015 - 23:58 pm
kill yourself
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [_GS_]amigoponcho


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 2 November 2014
글 개수:85
Posted 9 February 2015 - 00:02 am
+1 amigoponcho
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 23RaidingParty


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 27 May 2008
글 개수:2265
Edited 9 February 2015 - 11:52 am by 23RaidingParty
just raze earlier or try to rush
you play random civi and complain about civi??
it comes with the deal
otherwise go play mirror
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [ViCiouS]Skreemo


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 19 September 2010
글 개수:5389
Posted 10 February 2015 - 10:08 am
If you think about it, a lot of civs can cause big problems that are impossible to combat UU vs UU.

Saracens vs cav.
Teutons vs melee.
Byzantines vs inf.
Goths vs archers.
Huns vs buildings 11.

CBA always has been and always will be an imperfect product for random civ TG. It follows suit from RM, there's just a smaller window of opportunity where skill can influence a game outcome compared to RM.
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [dv8]xMag


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 23 March 2012
글 개수:1812
Posted 10 February 2015 - 10:59 am
Pers are ****ing slow ass and ****ing lame
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [Korps]DutchWeak


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 24 January 2015
글 개수:18
Posted 10 February 2015 - 13:23 pm
I hate to be pers cause idiot slow units, thats the ****ing handicap already ;)
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [Dvs_]Emissary_


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 25 July 2008
글 개수:1005
Posted 10 February 2015 - 13:45 pm
If you think about it, a lot of civs can cause big problems that are impossible to combat UU vs UU.

Saracens vs cav.
Teutons vs melee.
Byzantines vs inf.
Goths vs archers.
Huns vs buildings 11.

CBA always has been and always will be an imperfect product for random civ TG. It follows suit from RM, there's just a smaller window of opportunity where skill can influence a game outcome compared to RM.

The difference between the UU you brought up is most have multiple counters or at least 'matches'. Persia has one counter and two matches, jap and teut. Everything else fails miserably. And trying to get any decent kill count is a damn nightmare. It wasn't so bad when lots of players didn't use them properly but now everyone knows how rapey they are and how to use them.


링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [Dvs_]Emissary_


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 25 July 2008
글 개수:1005
Posted 10 February 2015 - 13:47 pm
just raze earlier or try to rush
you play random civi and complain about civi??
it comes with the deal
otherwise go play mirror

Oh great the standard village idiot trots out his line: YOU PLAYA RANDOM CIVI WOTTA YOU EXPECT ??!??!! **** off die in excruciating pain. Thank you.
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [ViCiouS]Skreemo


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 19 September 2010
글 개수:5389
Posted 11 February 2015 - 07:11 am
I am not so sure there is anything that can be done to weaken them. Removing their elite ability in Imp would help a lot, they are nearly unstoppable with that.
링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
 [eQ]Timon_The_Awful


그룹: 스탠다드 멤버십
참가 일: 5 August 2013
글 개수:104
Posted 1 March 2015 - 20:21 pm
Except they usually never get imp if they are played right (since archers behind usually get most of the kills).


링크 | 답변하기 | 인용하기
[1]
1 - 11 총 11 포스트 중
포럼 점프
1 User(s) are 이 주제를 읽고 있습니다. (지난 30 분 동안)
0 members, 1게스트